WORLD NEWS
Boyfriend Oversleeps After Promising Her a 4 A.M. Ride to Work. She’s Mad, but He Says He Was ‘Doing Her a Favor’
NEED TO KNOW
- A woman accepted her boyfriend’s offer to drive her to work after running out of money for ride shares
- He repeatedly overslept, leaving her scrambling for last-minute transportation and arriving late
- When she expressed frustration, he told her she had “no right” to be upset since he was “doing her a favor”
A woman sought advice from the Reddit community after ongoing frustration with her boyfriend left her questioning whether she was wrong for feeling upset.
After accepting a new job with hours starting as early as 4 a.m., she depended on her boyfriend for rides when ride-sharing costs quickly became too expensive.
In her post, the 22-year-old explained that she had started a new job at the end of November that required her to arrive between 4 and 5 a.m. She shared that she initially relied on Uber and Lyft but “ran out of money before my first paycheck since the pay is bi-weekly.”
Stock photo of a woman turning off an alarm clock.
Getty Stock Images
When she casually mentioned this financial stress to her 24-year-old boyfriend, she said he offered his help without being pressured. “He suggested it by saying ‘I’m sure that I can take you,’ ” she wrote, adding that she even double-checked with him to be sure he was comfortable committing to the early mornings.
According to the woman, the plan worked at first, but quickly fell apart after a few days. “The first couple days were fine, but on day three he almost didn’t wake up,” she explained, noting that the next day he didn’t wake up at all despite having promised.
What hurt her most was not just the missed ride, but his reaction when she expressed frustration. She recalled that instead of apologizing, he told her she had “no right to be mad because it was a ‘favor.’ ”
Weeks later, an unreliable ride-share service in her area put her in another stressful position when one driver made her 40 minutes late to work. Hoping to avoid another issue, she asked her boyfriend if he could help just for one morning, and she said that he agreed.
The next morning, the familiar pattern repeated itself. “I woke up at 3 a.m., texted him, no answer,” she wrote, explaining that after brief communication, he stopped responding entirely, forcing her to give up and order another Uber to make it to work.
By the time he finally woke up hours later, the emotional damage had already been done. She shared that he was upset with her for being upset, while she felt worn down and defeated rather than angry. “I’m not even enraged about it, I’m just over it,” she said.
“I’m frustrated not because he can’t wake up early, but because he keeps agreeing to do something and then blowing me off,” she wrote.
Although she admitted it may have been unwise to rely on him again after being let down before, she added that he had shown small signs of effort recently. She pointed out that he had started timing his lunch breaks with her shift so he could pick her up, which gave her hope he was trying.
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
In the end, she asked the Reddit community whether she was wrong for feeling the way she did or if her boyfriend was at fault for failing to keep his word. Many commenters were quick to reassure her that her feelings were valid and that the situation went beyond a simple favor.
Stock photo of a man sleeping.
Getty
“NTA. Work is important,” one commenter wrote, explaining that once someone offers a ride to work, it becomes a real commitment. “It’s not something that can be blown off without notice. He put you in a stressful situation having to scramble and make new plans last minute. Anyone would be frustrated in your shoes.”
Another commenter focused on the broader implications for the relationship. “Having a dependable ride to a dependable job is important to your wellbeing, present and future,” they wrote.
“It is not clear what stage your relationship is in, but in all kinds of ways, these are things on which good couples support each other,” the commenter continued. “At whatever level, if you are going to be in a relationship at all, you need to be supportive of your partner’s efforts to earn a living. That is basic to survival and well-being. It would have been better if he had told you from the start that he could not give you a ride to work. AH or no, at its most basic, this guy is not good life partner material. I’d move on.”
Mum-of-five Celia Marsh, 42, collapsed in the street half an hour after eating what was supposed to be a ‘dairy free’ Pret a Manger sandwich – her family have now been given a £1.25million payout
Benedict Tetzlaff-Deas News Reporter and Nev Ayling
09:49, 10 Dec 2025
Milk allergy sufferer Celia Marsh, 42, died after eating a Pret wrap that was labelled ‘dairy free’(Image: Supplied by Champion News)
The family of a mum who was killed by a “dairy-free” Pret a Manger sandwich have been handed £1.25m payout.
Dental nurse Celia Marsh, 42, collapsed and died after eating a Pret “vegan rainbow” flatbread sandwich while walking around Bath on a post-Christmas shopping trip with her husband and three of her daughters in December 2017. Mrs Marsh, who was allergic to milk, thought the sandwich contained a safe coconut yoghurt alternative – but was unaware that it was contaminated with milk protein.
She began to feel unwell shortly after eating the sandwich, and collapsed in the street. Despite the help of a passing first aider, the mother-of-five died in hospital shortly after being rushed there in an ambulance.
Pret A Manger settled for £1.25million with Mrs Marsh’s family out of court(Image: SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Following an inquest into her death in 2022, the senior coroner for Avon, Maria Voisin, put the blame for her death on the contaminated sandwich, writing in her report: “A product which is marked ‘dairy-free’ should be free from dairy.”
Mrs Marsh’s husband, Andy, who described her as his “best friend,” then launched a High Court compensation claim on behalf of his family against the high street cafe chain and the product’s manufacturer, Planet Coconut Ltd. And this week, following out of court negotiations, Mr Marsh has now agreed to settle the claim, with lawyers yesterday revealing in the High Court that the family will receive a total of £1.25million.
Having been asked to approve one part of the settlement, the judge, Master Mark Gidden, was told that Pret will be responsible for 25% of the payout, with Planet Coconut’s insurers liable for the rest. In her report following the inquest, the coroner revealed that an investigation by the Bath and North East Somerset Trading Standards and others traced the dairy to a product in the wrap, which was “made by Planet Coconut and marketed as a dairy free coconut yoghurt alternative”.
The Pret super-veg rainbow flat bread was contaminated with traces of milk protein(Image: Pret)
She added: “The wrap contained a product which was marked as ‘dairy free coconut yoghurt alternative,’ but despite this it contained milk protein, which was the cause of Celia’s anaphylaxis. “The contamination arose because an ingredient in the yoghurt called HG1 had become cross-contaminated with milk protein during its manufacture. The manufacturer of the dairy free yoghurt had in its possession documents which flagged this risk but this risk was not passed on to its customers.”
Within 15 minutes of eating the sandwich, she had been hit with an acute allergic reaction, and within half an hour she had collapsed, the inquest heard. Mrs Marsh gave herself an adrenaline shot with the EpiPen she always carried and a passing first aider tried to help. An ambulance rushed her to hospital, but she was pronounced dead by 4pm the same day.
Following the inquest, her eldest daughter, Ashleigh Grice, said her mum had lived in “constant fear” and religiously checked all food labelling, often “triple checking” what she ate. Mr Marsh sued Pret and Planet Coconut over his wife’s death and after negotiations outside court, the parties yesterday had a settlement of the claim approved by the judge.
Family barrister, Hannah Noyce, told the judge that Pret and Planet Coconut had agreed a split of the liability for the payment, which she said totals £1.25million.
“Both defendants initially agreed apportionment of liability on the basis of 75/25 in favour of Pret, but Pret wasn’t prepared to agree terms that would make all defendants jointly and severally liable,” she said. They wanted specific sums to be agreed. It was agreed that Planet Coconut’s insurers be made party to the agreement and that they should be jointly and severally liable for Planet Coconut’s share.” The hearing, conducted via a video link at the High Court in London, was in order for Master Gidden to approve one specific part of the settlement, which he said he was “content” to do.
Following Mrs Marsh’s death, the coroner published a special “prevention of future deaths” report, calling for the establishment of a system of recording cases of severe allergic reactions to provide an “early warning” of “products with undeclared allergen content”. The report also recommended a system of checks to ensure food is correctly labelled “free from” and “vegan,” leading to the Food Standards Agency updating its labelling guidance.
The Mirror has approached Pret A Manger for comment.
Australia’s prime minister has warned that implementing the country’s new social media ban for children under 16 – which came into force on Wednesday – will be difficult.
Parents across Australia are reported to have found their children distraught after discovering they had been shut out of online platforms.
Some children are said to be fooling age estimation technology by drawing on fake facial hair or using parents and older siblings to dodge the implementation of the ban.
From Wednesday, a host of social media sites face fines of up to $49.5m (£25m) if they fail to take reasonable steps to remove the accounts of the banned teenagers.
While Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the move as “the day when Australian families are taking back power from these big tech companies”, many young people used their last few hours to criticise the government.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Australian PM hails social media ban
The prime minister, who has lost over 6,000 followers across TikTok and Instagram since Tuesday, has borne the brunt of anger about the ban’s introduction, which he warned “won’t be perfect”.
One comment on his TikTok account read “just wait until we’re able to vote”, another said, “still here mate”.
Parents whose children have large social media followings and use online platforms as part of their businesses raised alarm over the financial impact of the ban.
Simone Clements said the social media ban would come at a financial cost to her 15-year-old twins Carlee and Hayden Clements. Carlee is an actor, model, dancer, singer and influencer, while her brother is an actor and model.
Both have used social media to grow their following online and income stream.
Two teenagers have even launched a legal bid to try and challenge the ban.
However, despite the criticism, the ban has been widely welcomed by many.
Wayne Holdsworth, whose son took his own life after being targeted in an online sextortion scam, described the law as a start.
Holdsworth, who became an age restriction advocate following his son’s death, said: “Our kids that we’ve lost haven’t died in vain because today they’ll be looking down very proud of the work that we’ve all done.”
Australia’s new social media ban for under-16s came into effect on Wednesday. Pic: Reuters
Read more:
One big problem with Australia’s social media ban
X handed €120m fine for breaking social media rules by EU
Flossie Brodribb, a 12-year-old advocate for a social media ban for young children, described the plan as bold and brave.
She added: “It will help kids like me to grow up healthier, safer, kinder and more connected to the real world.”
The government has said it will report by Christmas if the under-16 social media ban is working.
Communications minister Anika Wells warned children who had managed to evade the start of the ban that they would eventually be caught.
“Just because they might have avoided it [detection] today doesn’t mean they will be able to avoid it in a week’s time or a month’s time because social media platforms have to go back and routinely check under-16 accounts,” she said.
Ms Wells added that more than 200,000 TikTok accounts in Australia had already been deactivated.
New Ofcom data raises UK concerns
Countries around the world are watching Australia’s new ban closely due to concerns social media use among young people could be causing harm.
New Ofcom figures show children in the UK between eight and 14 are spending an average of nearly three hours online each day – often late at night.
According to the data, almost a quarter of time spent by that age group on their four main social media services happened between 9pm and 5am.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Australia bans under-16s from social media: Could UK be next?
While Ofcom found about 91% of those aged eight to 17 in the UK were happy with their online activity, 70% of 11 to 17-year-olds saw or heard harmful content online over a four-week period.
The data also raises concerns over children spending money online on social media sites, video-sharing platforms or while gaming – with more than half of children aged eight to 17 having done so in the past month.
Around a third of children regretted their in-game purchases and 43% regretted those made on social media.
Alarmingly, some 42% were unclear on what they even were buying in-game.
Former UK education secretary Lord Nash highlighted earlier this month how social media use seems to often start at an even younger age.
He warned that new analysis by the Centre for Social Justice suggested more than 800,000 UK children aged between three and five were already engaging with social media.
Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.
Mulanje and Lilongwe, Malawi — Ireen Makata sits in her white nursing uniform on a weathered bench at a health post in Malawi’s southern Mulanje district.
The facility is one of 13 in the district, located within a seminomadic, predominantly agricultural community 65km (40 miles) east of Blantyre, Malawi’s commercial capital, near the Mulanje mountain range.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
The beige-painted facility stands out from the dozens of huts around it made of red bricks, with straw roofs. To the right of the main entrance is a supply room with diminishing medical supplies. On the other side is an ambulance that Makata says is now rarely used.
Health posts like this were set up to serve remote communities and alleviate pressure on district hospitals. They were crucial in providing communities with basic healthcare, antenatal care, family planning and vaccines.
The clinic in Mulanje used to see dozens of women a day, providing maternal care, including helping women give birth, dispensing medicines and, when needed, transport to the hospital. But now, since funds were cut, it is open only around once every two weeks, stretching its supplies for as long as it can and unable to regularly transport visiting healthcare workers.
Health posts like this are facing closure – 20 have already shuttered in the country – due to the Trump administration cutting United States Agency for International Development (USAID) funding in February. This is forcing the country’s health system to withdraw critical services, placing further stress on hospitals, and leaving thousands of women and children without needed care in a region burdened by poverty and long distances to hospitals.
Makata, a nursing officer specialising in maternal and newborn care, usually based at the district hospital, says she used to visit the post two or three times a week. Now she rarely comes and no longer sees most of the patients she used to care for.
“Most of the women who relied on this post now find the distance to access a district hospital too far,” she tells Al Jazeera.
It would take a large chunk of a day, travelling on the bumpy dirt roads of Mulanje district, to reach one. That long visit “takes them away from their day-to-day activities, which bring income or food to their table,” she explains.
Many cannot afford to do that and now go without care.
“They are failing to get the ideal treatment for antenatal care services, especially during the first trimester of pregnancy,” Makata says.
Ireen Makata, a nursing officer and safe motherhood coordinator at Musa Community Health Post in Mulanje [Imran-Ullah Khan/Al Jazeera]
‘Baby and mother in jeopardy’
USAID funding was all-encompassing. It funded remote medical outposts, covering everything from the training of new staff and the provision of drugs and supplies for pregnant women to petrol for ambulances.
The US government provided close to 32 percent of Malawi’s total health budget before the cuts.
USAID funded the health posts through a programme called MOMENTUM in 14 of Malawi’s 28 districts, starting in 2022, helping strengthen existing clinics and set up new ones. As of 2024, there were 249 posts. The programme also provided medical outreach to communities and equipment. About $80m was being invested in the programme by Washington.
Early this year, US President Donald Trump issued stop-work orders on USAID-funded programmes as part of an executive order to pause and re-evaluate foreign aid.
With that move, MOMENTUM was shelved, and the two dozen mobile posts were shuttered as a result. Medical trainees were left in limbo, and life-saving equipment was sold off in fire sales by Washington.
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) still provides technical and financial support to several remote districts for maternal and newborn health, but the available resources are not enough to cover the sites funded by MOMENTUM. There are fears that the UNFPA sites will run out of resources and supplies in the coming months.
In the wake of Trump’s funding cuts, health experts in Malawi have raised urgent concerns that new mothers and children will face the greatest impact, with many lives potentially lost as a result.
Makata has set up a WhatsApp group for women to contact her with concerns and questions, but she is frustrated that she cannot work as she used to.
“We would go to where people resided and give them permanent and long-term care,” she says, referring to the posts. “It’s not easy for me to see this. We can’t help those who need the services the most.”
Massitive Matekenya, a community leader for the Musa community in Mulanje district, dressed in a black blazer and oversized chequered-green tie, is at the vacant Mulanje health post.
These days, he says, it is hard to put on a brave face for the people he represents.
“Women in our community are now giving birth on the way to the district hospital since it’s such a long distance away,” says Matekenya. “That puts baby and mother in jeopardy with the potential of the mother bleeding out.”
Matekenya struggles to boost morale as he is constantly faced with community anger over the fact that medical outreach has ended.
He says a 40-year-old woman from his community recently died from malaria. “She had no quick referral to the nearest health facility due to issues of transport,” Matekenya says, noting that the community reached out to a politician but that his assistance came too late.
“I’m worried,” he says. “With family planning services not being offered any more, we are expecting to see a spike in pregnancies, and we are anticipating a possible rise in maternal deaths.”
Female patients recovering or awaiting treatment for obstetric fistula at the Bwaila Fistula Centre in Lilongwe [Imran-Ullah Khan/Al Jazeera]
Impact on fistula care
In a health clinic in Malawi’s capital, Lilongwe, a woman dressed in black with a golden brooch shuffles from hall to hall. Margaret Moyo is tending to her daily responsibilities as head coordinator at the Bwaila Fistula Centre.
Obstetric fistula occurs when a hole between the birth canal and bladder or rectum is formed during an obstructed and extended labour. Women who do not receive medical treatment can be left incontinent.
Beyond the physical pain, women suffering from obstetric fistula also face social stigma due to the constant leaking and are often ostracised from their communities.
The Bwaila Fistula Centre receives more than 400 patients a year from all over the country, as well as from districts in neighbouring Mozambique. It has 45 beds, one doctor and 14 specialised nurses, and some 30 patients were at the centre when Al Jazeera visited in August.
With fewer resources, individuals will not be seen as often during pregnancy, which could lead to undetected maternal health issues, including more cases of fistula, Moyo argues. She is also concerned that conversations around prevention and education will take a backseat.
“The focus should be on training midwives, access to care and education to delay pregnancy in younger women since they are often most at risk of fistula,” says Moyo.
Before the USAID cuts, Malawi’s government had already forecast a $23m shortfall for reproductive, maternal, and newborn health funding for 2025 owing to drops in foreign aid.
Margaret Moyo, head coordinator at the Bwaila Fistula Centre in Lilongwe [Imran-Ullah Khan/Al Jazeera]
‘I am able to help them’
For the past five years, Moyo has been running what she calls an “ambassador” programme at her facility. Patients who undergo successful fistula repair and are reintegrated into their communities are trained and sent out into their communities.
So far, 120 fistula survivors have become patient ambassadors who educate through community outreach to bring in new patients for treatment.
One such ambassador is Alefa Jeffrey. Wearing a grey “Freedom from Fistula Foundation” T-shirt, the 36-year-old mother of four crosses her arms and gazes towards the floor as she talks about being ostracised after she gave birth and developed a fistula.
“I wasn’t allowed to go to church because the other girls made fun of me and said I smelled bad because I was leaking urine and stool,” she says. “My family told me to go to a traditional healer, but he wasn’t able to help.”
Jeffrey could deal with the physical pain, but she was tormented by the negative interactions with friends and family.
“I got used to dealing with fistula, but it was what people were saying that was giving me the most pain,” recounts Jeffrey, who says she even contemplated suicide.
But she also started looking for answers, asking the traditional healer and then eventually meeting an ambassador who came to her community to speak to women.
Having successfully undergone treatment, involving surgery and follow-up patient and educational care, Jeffrey now advocates for fistula education.
She has set up a WhatsApp group for people to chat with her for information about the condition. She has also brought in 39 mothers from her community to the clinic.
“I’m an expert now. I’m able to convince people to come, which isn’t easy,” says Jeffrey. “Some women have lived with a fistula for so long they don’t believe they can be repaired, and they have already given up, but I am able to help them.”
Patients await treatment for various ailments at the Nsanje District Hospital [Imran-Ullah Khan/Al Jazeera]
Lessons from the past: ‘We didn’t panic’
Although health experts are worried about the future of a system without USAID in a country where more than 70 percent of the population lives below the poverty line, government leaders say they have been there before.
Back in 2017, during his first presidency, Trump halted funding for the UNFPA and several groups that provided family planning. Malawi’s government approached NGOs and other countries to alleviate the gaps in funding.
Through community and grassroots innovations, they believe they can weather the storm again.
“We didn’t panic when we heard about the USAID cuts,” says Dr Samson Mndolo, Malawi’s secretary of health. “Instead, we looked at how to be more efficient and get more services for our money.
“We looked at areas where we could maximise resources, so for example if an officer goes to a community to do immunisations, they can now provide family planning services in the same trip too.”
Sitting in his office in the Lilongwe City Council building behind an organised desk, Mndolo discusses the challenges.
“As soon as the stop-work orders came out, we lost close to 5,000 health workers. The majority of these are what we call HIV diagnostic assistants,” he says, referring to the fallout from the USAID cuts. “We are looking now to push towards a health system that is more community-based and not necessarily hospital-based.” In such a system, doctors and health workers from central hospitals would be dispatched more to remote communities, and regular community outreach would become part of their remit, requiring them to perform a wider array of services.
Mndolo and his colleagues are setting up online initiatives and WhatsApp chat groups to field questions from remote patients. He remains optimistic about Malawi’s health system and says the worst thing the country can do now is to lose hope.
“Each crisis is an opportunity. This gives us a chance to strengthen the system and retrain our workforce and digital health systems,” he says.
“We are not naive. This will take some time, but once we get a hold of that as a nation, we can be better with time; that is the opportunity that is there for us.”
Despite such reassurance, those in remote communities say they feel isolated.
Tendai Kausi, a 22-year-old mother from the Musa community in the Mulanje district, still goes to the remote health post for help with her four-year-old son, Saxton. But because of the cuts and closures, many women from her community do not, and she has seen new mothers carry pregnancies in their isolated villages – far from healthcare and without routine checks.
“This is not good for the development of our country,” she says.
“My child will be affected because the services here will not get better,” Kausi says. “I feel very sad for my community.”
Patients at the Bwaila Fistula Centre [Imran-Ullah Khan/Al Jazeera]
SOURCE PAGE
WORLD NEWS
Reeves faces Treasury committee before Tory censure motion in Commons saying she misled voters about budget – UK politics live | Politics
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, will start giving evidence to the Treasury committee at 10am. She will appear alongside James Bowler, permanent secretary at the Treasury, and Dharmesh Nayee, its director of strategy, planning and budget.
This is what the Treasury committee said in a news release about the topics it wants to cover.
Members are likely to examine the significant changes to the Treasury’s tax and spending plans, and potential implications for the economy, public services and government debt.
The chancellor is also expected to answer questions on topical issues, such as how her department handled the months leading up to the budget and the recently announced leak inquiry.
Share
Starmer says £500m boost to youth services will give every child ‘chance to thrive’
Keir Starmer has been tweeting this morning about the national youth strategy.
It’s our generation’s responsibility to break down barriers to opportunity for young people.
We’re investing in youth services so every child has the chance to thrive and we’re boosting apprenticeships so young people can see their talents take them as far as they can.
At the heart of the strategy is a plan to spend £500m boosting youth services. This is how the Department for Culture, Media and Sport summarises it.
-Build or refurbish up to 250 youth facilities over the next four years, as well as providing equipment for activities to around 2,500 youth organisations, through a new £350m ‘Better Youth Spaces’ programme. It will provide safe and welcoming spaces, offering young people somewhere to go, something meaningful to do, and someone who cares about their wellbeing.
-Launch a network of 50 Young Futures Hubs by March 2029 as part of a local transformation programme of £70m, providing access to youth workers and other professionals, supporting their wellbeing and career development and preventing them from harm.
-The first eight hubs to be operational by March 2026 are in Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, County Durham, Nottingham, Bristol, Tower Hamlets, and Brighton and Hove.
-Support organisations in underserved areas to deliver high-quality youth work and activities through a ‘Richer Young Lives Fund’ worth over £60m.
-Boost young people’s wellbeing, personal development, and essential life skills through a new £22.5m programme of support around the school day in up to 400 schools.
-Recruit and train youth workers, volunteers and other trusted adults with £15 million of investment.
-Strengthen youth services through £5 million to improve local partnerships, better information sharing, and digital infrastructure, ensuring young people receive high-quality, safe, and effective support in their communities.
Share
Nandy says she does not think Australian-style social media ban for teenagers could be enforced in UK
Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, was on the media round for the government this morning. She was there to talk about the new national youth strategy being published today. There is a news release about it here, the actual strategy is available here, and here is Pippa Crerar’s story about it, based on an interview with Nandy.
In the interview Nandy expressed scepticism about the UK followng Australia and banining under-16s from having social media accounts.
She has spoken more about that in her interviews this morning. She said the government is not totally ruling out doing something similar. Asked if the UK would follow Australia if the Australian ban is deemed a success, she told BBC Breakfast:
Yes, we certainly would consider it, not only if it worked, but if young people … believed that it was working and trusted that that was a solution.
But she also stressed that at this point the government is not minded to introduce a similar social media ban for teenagers. She told Times Radio:
We don’t think [this will be a good idea]. We asked young people what they thought about it, and the overwhelming response was concerns about enforceability.
Are we seriously saying that we’re going to start prosecuting young people for going on social media?
There’s also a real concern particularly amongst girls that if people can’t see the problem with behaviour online, they won’t be able to see the problem with behaviour in the real world.
What they really wanted was more education, more advice, and particularly someone who cared about them, who they could talk to, an adult who they could trust … to be able to navigate some of this.
Lisa Nandy (centre) posing for a selfie during the National Youth Strategy launch event at Peckham Levels, London, yesterday. Photograph: Gareth Fuller/PAShare
Updated at 10.30 CET
Asylum overhaul in UK could lead to rise in homelessness and backlogs, says report
Shabana Mahmood’s radical plans to overhaul the asylum system could cause “unintended consequences” such as increased homelessness among people seeking refuge and growing case backlogs, Whitehall’s spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, has concluded. Rajeev Syal has the story.
Here is the NAO’s report. And here is its eight-page summary.
Share
Rachel Reeves faces Treasury committee before Tory censure motion in Commons saying she misled voters about budget
Good morning. It is PMQs today, but Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, is also facing intense scrutiny in the Commons today. She is giving evidence to the Treasury committee at 10am and then, from about 4pm, she will face a rare censure motion in the Commons.
Anyone who listens to Commons debates regularly will have heard an MP accuse another member of “misleading” people, only for the speaker to intervene to say they must have meant “unintentionally misleading”. Under rules intended to maintain decorum in debates, MPs are not allowed to accuse each other of lying, or anything similar. But there is an exception if whether or not a particular MP has lied is the actual subject of the debate.
And that is what is happening today. It is an opposition day, meaning the Conservative party can decide the motions to be debated, and it has tabled a censure motion urging Reeves “to apologise for misleading the country about the state of the public finances, rolling the pitch for raising taxes, breaking her promises and increasing welfare spending”. There is no chance of the motion passing, but it does mean that for about three hours in the Commons in it will be open season on the chancellor.
Commenting on the motion, Mel Stride, the shadow chancellor, said:
Rachel Reeves has repeatedly misled the British public. She promised she wouldn’t raise taxes on working people – and then she did. She insisted there was a black hole in the public finances – and there wasn’t.
Rachel Reeves has put party before country, so today the Conservatives are giving MPs the chance to formally censure the Chancellor and call on her to apologise to families across the country.
Here is the agenda for the day.
9.30am: The ONS publishes annual life expectancy figures.
Morning: David Lammy, the deputy PM and justice secretary, and Lord Hermer, the attorney general, attend a Council of Europe summit in Strasbourg to discuss migration and the European convention on human rights.
10am: Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, gives evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about the budget.
Noon: Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs.
After 12.30pm: MPs debate two Tory opposition days motions: first, one criticising the employment rights bill, and accusing the government of “making seasonal, flexible and part-time work more difficult”; and then another urging Reeves “to apologise for misleading the country about the state of the public finances, rolling the pitch for raising taxes, breaking her promises and increasing welfare spending”.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Updated at 10.38 CET
Ukraine is “ready for elections”, President Volodymyr Zelensky has said, after US President Donald Trump repeated claims Kyiv was “using war” to avoid holding them.
Zelensky’s five-year term as president was due to end in May 2024, but elections have been suspended in Ukraine since martial law was declared after Russia’s invasion.
Speaking to reporters following Trump’s comments in a wide-raging Politico interview, Zelensky said he would ask for proposals to be drawn up which could change the law.
Elections could be held in the next 60 to 90 days if security for the vote was guaranteed with the help of the US and other allies, he said.
“I’m asking now, and I’m stating this openly, for the US to help me, perhaps together with our European colleagues, to ensure security for the elections,” he told reporters.
“The issue of elections in Ukraine, I believe, depends first and foremost on our people, and this is a question for the people of Ukraine, not the people of other countries. With all due respect to our partners,” Zelensky said.
“I’ve heard hints that we’re clinging to power, or that I personally am clinging to the presidency” and “that’s why the war isn’t ending”, which he called “frankly, a completely unreasonable narrative”.
Zelensky won election in 2019 with more than 73% of the vote.
Russia has consistently claimed Zelensky is an illegitimate leader and demanded new elections as a condition of a ceasefire deal – a talking point which has been repeated by Trump.
“They talk about a democracy, but it gets to a point where it’s not a democracy anymore,” the US president told Politico.
There are significant practical obstacles to a wartime election.
Soldiers serving on the front lines could be either unable to vote or require leave to do so. According to the UN, there are about 5.7 million Ukrainians living abroad because of the conflict. And any ballot would require complex, additional security measures.
Such a vote would only be fair if all Ukrainians could participate, including soldiers fighting on the front line, a Ukrainian opposition MP told the BBC.
Lesia Vasylenko of Golos also told the BBC World Service’s Newsday programme that “elections are never possible in wartime”, alluding to the suspension of elections in the UK during World War Two.
Oleksiy Goncharenko, an opposition MP from the European Solidarity party, said: “I am completely against the idea, I can’t even understand why Zelensky would say it.”
“It is completely impossible. Elections are not just putting a tick in on a piece of paper – it is debates, it is a campaign, an entire process. Maybe Zelensky sees it as an opportunity to hold quasi-elections that will be favourable to him, while he controls the media and his opponents are likely not ready.”
Discussions around holding elections have made headlines since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
There is little domestic political pressure on Zelensky to call elections while the conflict is ongoing, said Oleksandr Merezhko, the chairman of the foreign policy committee in Ukraine’s parliament.
There was “strong consensus” among politicians and civil organisations that elections would not be held under martial law, the MP from the Servant of the People – Zelensky’s party – told the BBC.
“Even the opposition, which is against Zelensky and would like to see him removed are against elections, because they understand the danger of attempting to hold elections during the war,” he said.
The idea was “exactly what Putin would want”, Merezhko added. “An election campaign would be divisive. Having failed to destroy us from outside, Putin wants to destroy us from within, using elections as another tool to do so.”
A poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) in March found about 78% of people opposed holding elections after a ceasefire with security guarantees, and were of the opinion that they could only be held after a complete settlement.
The share fell to 63% in a September poll, while 22% said elections could be held after a ceasefire with security guarantees – a jump from 9% in March.
“Even a year ago, Zelensky said that he was ready for elections as soon as the conditions allow” in the face of previous pressure, Hanna Shelest, a foreign policy analyst with the think tank Ukrainian Prism, told the BBC.
The question was, however, how to create the conditions Zelensky outlined, Shelest told the Newsroom programme on the BBC World Service, given soldiers and refugees who would be voting as well as unsecured areas in the country and ongoing strikes.
“You cannot guarantee the security of the polling stations,” she said.
Zelensky is also facing continued and increasing pressure from Trump to agree to a peace deal to end the war, with the US leader urging Zelensky to “play ball” by ceding territory to Moscow.
He has suggested without evidence that Zelensky is the main obstacle to peace as US-led efforts to broker a deal continue.
The Kremlin said Trump’s “very important” statements on Ukraine, including saying Moscow would win the war and that Kyiv would need to hand over land, fall in line with Russia’s view.
“In many ways, on the subject of Nato membership, on the subject of territories, on the subjects of how Ukraine is losing land, it is in tune with our understanding,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
The UN’s educational, scientific and cultural agency,UNESCO. announced on Wednesday that Diwali, the Hindu festival of lights, have been added to its Intangible Cultural Heritage list.
“People in India and around the world are thrilled,” Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi posted on X after the announcement.
He called Diwali “the soul of our civilization,” adding that the move “will contribute to the festival’s global popularity even further.”
What is Diwali, India’s festival of lights?
Diwali, also known as Deepavali, is one of Hinduism’s most significant and widely observed festivals.
Millions of faithfull, including those from the Sikh and Jain religious communities, celebrate the five-day festival.
Diwali, which occurs on the new moon day in either late October or November, symbolizes the triumph of good over evil.
It is the 16th Indian tradition to be inscribed on UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage list, joining yoga, the Hindu pilgrimage Kumbh Mela and Durga Puja Festival of Kolkata.
Can ‘green’ firecrackers cut Dehli’s Diwali pollution?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
What are other new additions to UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage list?
Unesco members are meeting in New Delhi this week to review dozens of nominations submitted by 78 countries.
The new additions will join the cultural heritage list, created to “raise awareness of the diversity” of the traditions passed from one generation to another and ensure their protection for the future.
Here are some new traditions added to the list this year:
- Koshary, Egypt’s street food staple
- Al-Muhaibis, a game typically played during the month of Ramadan in Iraq
- Gifaataa, Wolaita people’s New Year festival in Ethiopia
- Commandaria from Cyprus, one of the oldest wines
- Ghana’s highlife music and dance
- Chile’s circus traditions
Iceland’s swimming pool culture also added to UNESCO’s cultural heritage list
Swimming pools are a big part of Iceland’s culture.
“Swimming pool culture holds a special and important place in the daily life of Icelanders,” said Lilja Alfredsdottir, Iceland’s former Minister of Culture and Trade, in 2024, when it was confirmed that this Icelandic culture was nominated for a UNESCO status.
Icelanders love to frequent the countless geothermal pools in the country.Image: Eric Baccega/imageBROKER/picture alliance
“Meeting in the hot tub or taking the family swimming is a social connection which is invaluable and makes its mark, not only physically, but spiritually as well,” she added.
Edited by: Louis Oelofse
WORLD NEWS
Trump suffers yet another election defeat after Miami elects first Democratic mayor in nearly 30 years: Live updates
Donald Trump suffers another defeat as Miami elects first Democrat mayor in 30 years
President Donald Trump has suffered another election blow, this time in his own backyard of Florida after Miami elected Democrat Eileen Higgins to be its new mayor, ending a three decade losing streak for her party in the city.
Higgins, 61, will become the first woman to lead Miami, a Hispanic-majority city that was swayed by her attacks on the president’s crackdown on undocumented migrants and mass deportation push, issues that threaten family members of many residents originating from Central America.
Despite the race officially being nonpartisan, she campaigned openly as a proud Democrat, ultimately defeating Trump-backed candidate Emilio Gonzalez, a former city manager, who has since called Higgins to offer his congratulations.
Here’s more on the latest ill omen for Republicans ahead of next year’s midterms.
Joe Sommerlad10 December 2025 09:25
Good morning
Hello and welcome to The Independent’s live coverage of the Donald Trump administration as the president suffers another election defeat and raises eyebrows with his latest rally remarks.
Joe Sommerlad10 December 2025 09:05
WORLD NEWS
Parents carry their children to school through muddy water ’caused by monstrous 60ft tall warehouse’ – as council promises to dig a ditch ‘as soon as weather permits’
Parents had to piggy-back their children through an ankle-deep flooded path that they say has been caused by four ‘monstrous’ 60ft tall warehouses.
Mothers and fathers filmed themselves during the morning school run wading through the muddy water near to the controversial Astley business park in Tyldesley, Wigan.
One mother can be seen pushing a pram with one hand while carrying her child under the other arm, with another parent high-stepping as they piggy-back their son to Garrett Hall Primary School.
They have blamed the construction of four mammoth 60ft tall warehouses in the shadow of their homes for flooding the pathway.
Now, Wigan Council has told them developers have promised to build a ditch along the path in a bid to stop the flooding.
In an email sent to a residents’ action group, which has been posted on Instagram, the council said the work would take place ‘without delay’, but only when ‘the weather permits’.
The Daily Mail has contacted Wigan Council for comment.
The development has caused anger with neighbours previously comparing the huge structures to ‘cruise liners’ towering over their homes and blocking sunlight.
Parents had to piggy-back their children through an ankle-deep flooded path that they say has been caused by four ‘monstrous’ 60ft tall warehouses
Mothers and fathers filmed themselves during the morning school run wading through the muddy water near to the controversial Astley business park in Tyldesley, Wigan
Residents are furious and believe the new development was signed off without proper ‘surface water plans’
Astley Warehouse Action Group said it had been messaging the council for weeks about the flooding before the local authority finally sent them ‘a plan’.
In an email, Wigan Council told the group council officers had met with the developers of the warehouse who had agreed to build a ‘drainage channel running along the length of the path’ and ‘the garden boundaries’.
‘They have committed to undertake this work without delay, as soon as weather permits this week,’ the council states.
‘Our officers have agreed with the developer that we will monitor the situation following this intervention, to establish whether the solution achieves the desired result in periods of heavy rain.
‘We are hopeful that the solution will address the issue, but if it does not then the council has made clear that a fuller investigation will be needed.’
Locals have claimed that the new development has been signed off without proper ‘surface water plans’, and families fear that heavy downpours could send floodwater into their homes.
Last week Wigan Council ignored a 10,000-strong signature petition and ruled out halting building works.
The grey giants are owned by giant landowner Peel Land and Property (PLP).
Ian Southwell, 60, has been left worried the water will soon pour into his £550,000 five-bedroom, detached home.
He said: ‘The flooding started about four weeks ago. Now, it’s the worst it has ever been.
‘I have to wear wellies to go in the garden. I’d say the water is about 1.5ft deep. I’m worried to death about it reaching the house, I can’t sleep at night.
‘As soon as I hear rain, I think about it coming up to the back door and into the house. Before the warehouses, we didn’t have this flooding whatsoever.’
It has meant parts of his garden are now unusable amid rising water, he said.
Ian lives with his wife Maxine and two of their daughters in the shadow of one of the huge warehouses.
One mother can be seen pushing a pram with one hand while carrying her child under the other arm
The 60ft warehouses at Astley Business Park in Tyldesley, Wigan, have angered local residents
Floodwater in Ian Southwell’s garden which sits in the shadow of one of the huge structures
Floodwater pooling across the bottom of Ian Southwell’s garden, with standing water covering plants and reaching the fence
He added: ‘My garden is totally flooded at the bottom, it has killed off all my plants.
‘The back gate is rotten, so that needs replacing – and I’m probably going to need a new fence.
‘I’ve got lights in the garden and they’re actually submerged now, so I’ve had to turn them all off.’
Pictures show gardens transformed into murky pools, with brown water lapping against fence posts and swallowing lawns.
In several images, grass vanishes beneath inches of water, turning gardens into swamps.
Paths leading up to a nearby school also flooded for the first time, with parents having to ‘carry their kids’ over the floodwater on some walkways.
Residents insisted flooding was never an issue until construction began on the 350,000 sq ft industrial site – which has already leased one of the units to delivery giant Whistl on a long-term basis.
After complaining to Wigan Council about flooding, residents said they were told that the areas affected did not ‘form part of council’s adopted highway’, so the authority was not responsible.
It comes despite families saying they are ‘scared to go into their gardens’ in case the surface water issues cause any larger problems with sink holes.
Residents were forced to avoid some sections of the school route due to large sections being flooded
The huge buildings loom in the background of some of the houses in Tyldesley
Residents are now scared to enter their garden, worrying that surface water could lead to sink holes
Dave Gerrard, 46, has lived on the estate since 2019 and claimed flooding has made the bottom part of his garden unusable.
He said: ‘There’s a gate that I used to take the dog out onto the field – and it’s completely underwater now.
‘The water comes right over onto my patio area. In a couple of years, my whole fence will have rotted away.
‘I’m already thinking it’s going to cost me a lot of money.’
Dave, a builder of 30 years, added: ‘We’ve told Wigan Council that there has been a breach of planning rules, because there needs to be proper drainage in place.
‘But they’ve just ignored us as usual. We told them that the flooding was going to happen – it’s not come as a surprise.’
The flooding has also left families fearing the impact on house prices – adding to anger over the size and scale of the warehouses themselves, which they say they were never properly warned about during the planning process.
The Astley Warehouse Action Group, which has thousands of followers on social media, claim that revised planning drawings and water-management changes were never properly consulted on.
Wigan Council has already rejected a 10,000-signature petition demanding work be paused, saying no breach of planning control had occurred.
Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has previously met and discussed plans with residents.
They noted he was ‘sympathetic’ to their concerns but was limited in power.
Their demands follow Councillor James Fish quitting Wigan Council’s planning committee after being the only councillor to vote against the original warehouse plans.
He has also claimed his colleagues have admitted behind close doors, they ‘didn’t release how tall’ the buildings would be.
Other families in the area are questioning whether or not to stay and are concerned about the structures’ impact on property values.
The authority has been approached for further comment.
A spokesperson for PLP said the firm would not be commenting.
Three Met Office weather warnings remain in place today as Storm Bram continues to batter the UK – with the national weather agency warning of a ‘danger to life’ in places
SOURCE PAGE
The richest 10 percent of the world’s population now owns three-quarters of all personal wealth, according to the newly released World Inequality Report 2026.
Income is not much different, where the top 50 percent of earners take home more than 90 percent, while the poorest half of the world receives less than 10 percent of total income.
The report, which has been published annually since 2018, notes that the 2026 edition arrives at a critical time. Worldwide, living standards are stagnating for many, while wealth and power are increasingly concentrated at the top.
(Al Jazeera)
The differences between wealth and income inequality
Wealth and income levels do not always go hand in hand. The wealthiest are not necessarily the highest earners, highlighting the persistent divide between what people earn and what they own.
Wealth includes the total value of a person’s assets-such as savings, investments or property, after subtracting their debts.
In 2025, the wealthiest 10 percent of the world’s population owned 75 percent of global wealth, the middle 40 percent held 23 percent, and the bottom half controlled only 2 percent.
Since the 1990s, the wealth of billionaires and centi-millionaires has grown by about 8 percent each year, almost twice the rate of the bottom half of the world’s population.
The wealthiest 0.001 percent – fewer than 60,000 multimillionaires – now control three times more wealth than half of humanity. Their share has climbed from almost 4 percent in 1995 to more than 6 percent today.
The poorest have made small gains, but these are overshadowed by the rapid accumulation at the very top, resulting in a world where a tiny minority holds extraordinary financial power, while billions still struggle for basic economic security.
Income is measured using pre-tax earnings, after accounting for pension and unemployment insurance contributions.
In 2025, the richest 10 percent of the world received 53 percent of global income, the middle 40 percent received 38 percent, and the bottom 50 percent earned just 8 percent.
For example, if the world comprised 10 people and total global income was $100, then the richest person would receive $53, the next four people would collectively earn $38, and the remaining five people would divide $8 among them.
How is wealth and income divided regionally?
Inequality looks very different around the world. A person’s birthplace remains one of the strongest factors in determining how much they earn and the wealth they can build. However, the regions also include poor and wealthy countries, and figures in the report are averages.
In 2025, the average wealth of people in North America and Oceania, which the report has grouped together, stood at 338 percent of the world’s average, making it the wealthiest region globally. Income share stood at 290 percent of the world’s average, also the highest in the world.
Europe and East Asia followed, remaining above the world average, while vast parts of sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, Latin America and the Middle East remained far below the global average.
(Al Jazeera)
Global inequality paints a stark picture, but the scale of wealth and income gaps can vary widely from one country to another. While some nations show slightly more balanced distributions, others reveal extreme concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.
Which countries have the highest income inequality?
South Africa has the highest levels of income inequality in the world. The top 10 percent earn 66 percent of total income, while the bottom half receives only 6 percent.
Latin American countries such as Brazil, Mexico, Chile and Colombia show a similar trend, where the richest 10 percent receive nearly 60 percent of earnings.
European countries offer a more balanced picture. In Sweden and Norway, the bottom 50 percent earn about 25 percent of total income, while the top 10 percent receive less than 30 percent.
Many developed economies, including Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom, fall in the middle. The top 10 percent earn roughly 33-47 percent of total income, while the bottom half takes 16-21 percent.
In Asia, income distribution is mixed. Countries like Bangladesh and China have a more balanced structure, whereas India, Thailand, and Turkiye remain top-heavy, with the richest 10 percent earning more than half of all income.
The table below shows where income is divided most unequally.
Which countries have the highest wealth inequality?
When it comes to wealth inequality, once again, South Africa tops the list. The top 10 percent control 85 percent of personal wealth, leaving the bottom 50 percent with negative shares – meaning their debt exceeds assets.
Russia, Mexico, Brazil and Colombia show a similar pattern, with the richest grabbing 70 percent or more, while the poorest receive barely 2–3 percent.
European countries such as Italy, Denmark, Norway and the Netherlands are relatively more balanced. Here, the middle 40 percent capture about 45 percent, and the bottom half takes a slightly larger share, though the top 10 percent still dominate. However, Sweden and Poland’s bottom 50 percent have negative shares in wealth.
Even wealthy nations like the United States, UK, Australia, and Japan are far from equal. The top 10 percent earn more than half of the total income, while the bottom half is left with just 1–5 percent.
Emerging economies in Asia – including China, India and Thailand – also show stark inequalities. The richest 10 percent control roughly 65 – 68 percent of wealth, highlighting a persistent concentration at the top.