Scientists have found that the risk of shingles may rise slightly in the weeks following a Covid booster shot.

The discovery comes from researchers at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, who analyzed electronic health records from more than two million people aged 12 and older who had received at least one Covid vaccine.

The study found that the risk of developing shingles within 28 days of vaccination increased by seven percent when all doses were combined and by 21 percent after the third, or booster, dose of an mRNA vaccine.

Shingles, which appears as a painful, blistering rash, is caused by the varicella-zoster virus, which most people first encounter in childhood as chickenpox. 

Separate research found that adults aged 50 and over who were hospitalized with shingles were seven times more likely to develop dementia.

Among men of all ages, researchers found a significantly higher risk of shingles after receiving a vector-based vaccine, with a 38 percent increase. 

The authors noted that the increase in shingles risk after a booster mRNA dose is small, temporary, and limited to certain subgroups, and most cases are treated in general practice rather than requiring hospitalization.

The study comes as the FDA is drawing up plans to put a ‘black box’ warning on Covid vaccines, the agency’s most serious warning over potential side effects, reports suggested.

Shingles, which appears as a painful, blistering rash, is caused by the varicella-zoster virus, which most people first encounter in childhood as chickenpox 

A black box warning, which appears at the top of prescribing information, is placed on drugs or vaccines to highlight major risks such as serious side effects or restrictions. 

The move by the FDA was revealed to CNN by two people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. 

The new study, published in the peer‑reviewed journal Drug Safety on December 11, suggested that shingles might occur after a Covid booster because important immune cells, called lymphocytes, can be temporarily depleted after vaccination, which may allow the virus that causes shingles to wake up. 

Repeated vaccine doses, especially a third booster, might also make T-cells less active for a short time, and T-cells help control viruses that hide in the body. 

The researchers emphasized that this does not prove the vaccine causes shingles, only that there is a small, temporary link in some people.

The study noted that Hong Kong reported a sharp increase in hospitalizations for shingles shortly after Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination.

However, a US study using healthcare claims data found no increased risk after Covid vaccination, and vaccination was not linked to a higher risk than flu shots.

The team conducted the study in three steps, including analyzing all available Covid vaccines, including unknown brands. 

Join the debate

Should the public be better warned about vaccine side effects?

The study found that the risk of developing shingles within 28 days of vaccination increased by seven percent when all doses were combined and by 21 percent after the third, or booster, dose of an mRNA vaccine

Second, vaccines were separated by type, mRNA versus vector. 

mRNA vaccines, like Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, use genetic material in the form of mRNA to instruct cells directly to make the spike protein. 

Vector vaccines, like AstraZeneca or Johnson & Johnson, use a different virus, modified so it can’t replicate, to carry the instructions into cells.  Then the team analyzed the vaccines by brand.  

For individuals who received two doses less than 28 days apart, it was difficult to determine which vaccine caused shingles, so only those with a consistent vaccination regimen were included in the type- and brand-specific analyses, according to the study.

The median age of the participants was 51 years, with most people falling within an age range of 32 years around the median. 

The two most common health conditions were cardiovascular disease, affecting 539,134 people (25.7%) and chronic lung disease, affecting 341,747 people (16.3%). 

Most participants, 1,145,212 people (54.6%), received two vaccine doses. 

The most commonly given vaccine was Pfizer/BioNTech, which made up 69.2 percent of all doses, followed by Moderna at 18.6 percent. 

A study published in April, which spanned for more than two decades, found shingles could trigger early-onset dementia. 

Crucially, the greatest risk was seen in those aged 50 to 65, which is younger than the typical age of dementia patients. 

In the new study, the Italian researchers recruited 132,986 adults aged 50 and older.

Of these, 12,088 were hospitalized with a diagnosis of shingles, termed ‘herpes zoster disease’ in the study.

After just one year, there was a two-fold increase in early dementia seen in the severe shingles group, compared to those in the other two groups. 

SOURCE PAGE

As online platforms grapple with how to establish trust at a global scale and address growing concerns about authenticity, the adoption of profile verification on LinkedIn is picking up pace in 2025. India is emerging as the fastest-growing market for profile verification, highlighting the country’s expanding influence on how digital work networks operate.

LinkedIn members are adding around 30 million verifications to their profiles each year, with adoption up more than 38% year-over-year in 2025, according to Oscar Rodriguez, LinkedIn’s vice president of trust products. The increase follows the company’s announcement last week that more than 100 million users have added at least one verification.

In 2022, LinkedIn began rolling out profile verification to provide clearer signals of authenticity on the platform. It initially focused on confirming members’ workplace or identity, including through company email addresses, before expanding to government-issued ID checks, and has since been extended to company pages and job listings.

Most LinkedIn members who have added a verification to their profile have done so by confirming their association with a workplace, typically using a company email address or similar credentials, rather than verifying their personal identity.

About 60% of verified members have confirmed a workplace affiliation, typically using a company email address, while roughly 27% have verified their identity using a government-issued ID, Rodriguez said.

The pace of India growth

Geographically, the U.S. accounts for the largest share of verified users, representing about 40% of the more than 100 million members who have added at least one verification, the company said. India follows closely, alongside other major markets, including the U.K., Canada, Brazil, and France.

While the U.S. continues to account for the largest overall share of verified users, India has emerged as LinkedIn’s fastest-growing market for profile verification, Rodriguez said, with adoption rising about 80% over the past 12 months.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

India is already one of LinkedIn’s largest and fastest-growing user markets globally, with more than 160 million users, and the pace of verification adoption there is unfolding alongside broader growth in professional networking, hiring, and remote work on the platform. This underscores how shifts in India’s workforce are increasingly shaping LinkedIn’s global usage patterns.

As verification adoption has grown, LinkedIn has also begun extending those signals beyond its own platform.

Earlier this year, the Microsoft-owned company launched its “Verified on LinkedIn” program, allowing partner platforms to display LinkedIn verification badges. Zoom is the most recent partner for this move, joining companies such as Adobe and G2. The company also recently introduced a self-serve API to make it easier for other organizations to integrate verification into their own services.

LinkedIn says profile verification is associated with higher engagement on the platform, with verified members seeing up to 60% more profile views and around 50% more interaction on their posts compared with unverified users. Verified company pages also tend to attract more attention, recording significantly higher views and follower growth, the company stated.

“Verifications provide a powerful signal of authenticity on LinkedIn, helping to support authenticity and trust,” said Rodriguez. “Members with verifications are far more likely to represent real people, and jobs with verifications of the page, and hirer maintain significantly higher integrity and safety standards.”

SOURCE PAGE

Liv McMahonTechnology reporter

Getty Images

The UK government says it will ban so-called “nudification” apps as part of efforts to tackle misogyny online.

New laws – announced on Thursday as part of a wider strategy to halve violence against women and girls – will make it illegal to create and supply AI tools letting users edit images to seemingly remove someone’s clothing.

The new offences would build on existing rules around sexually explicit deepfakes and intimate image abuse, the government said.

“Women and girls deserve to be safe online as well as offline,” said Technology Secretary Liz Kendall.

“We will not stand by while technology is weaponised to abuse, humiliate and exploit them through the creation of non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes.”

Creating deepfake explicit images of someone without their consent is already a criminal offence under the Online Safety Act.

Ms Kendall said the new offence – which makes it illegal to create or distribute nudifying apps – would mean “those who profit from them or enable their use will feel the full force of the law”.

Nudification or “de-clothing” apps use generative AI to realistically make it look like a person has been stripped of their clothing in an image or video.

Experts have issued warnings about the rise of such apps and the potential for fake nude imagery to inflict serious harm on victims – particularly when used to create child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

In April, the Children’s Commissioner for England Dame Rachel de Souza called for a total ban on nudification apps.

“The act of making such an image is rightly illegal – the technology enabling it should also be,” she said in a report.

The government said on Thursday it would “join forces with tech companies” to develop methods to combat intimate image abuse.

This would include continuing its work with UK safety tech firm SafeToNet, it said.

The UK company developed AI software it claimed could identify and block sexual content, as well as block cameras when they detect sexual content is being captured.

Such tech builds on existing filters implemented by platforms such as Meta to detect and flag potential nudity in imagery, often with the aim of stopping children taking or sharing intimate images of themselves.

‘No reason to exist’

Plans to ban nudifying apps come after previous calls from child protection charities for the government to crack down on the tech.

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) – whose Report Remove helpline allows under-18s to confidentially report explicit images of themselves online – said 19% of confirmed reporters had said some or all of their imagery had been manipulated.

Its chief executive Kerry Smith welcomed the measures.

“We are also glad to see concrete steps to ban these so-called nudification apps which have no reason to exist as a product,” she said.

“Apps like this put real children at even greater risk of harm, and we see the imagery produced being harvested in some of the darkest corners of the internet.”

However while children’s charity the NSPCC welcomed the news, its director of strategy Dr Maria Neophytou said it was “disappointed” to not see similar “ambition” to introduce mandatory device-level protections.

The charity is among organisations calling on the government to make tech firms find easier ways to identify and prevent spread of CSAM on their services, such as in private messages.

The government said on Thursday it would make it “impossible” for children to take, share or view a nude image on their phones.

It is also seeking to outlaw AI tools designed to create or distribute CSAM.

SOURCE PAGE

A whistleblower has leaked horrifying footage showing slaughterhouse workers shooting, beating, stabbing, and urinating on cows.

The videos were recorded at Georgia’s Best Processing in Fort Valley, Georgia, and reportedly shared among workers for amusement, according to PETA.

The clips, which PETA said were recorded in the Fall, show workers urinating on cows’ faces, striking them with pipes and stabbing them while the animals struggled to stand. 

One video appears to show a worker shooting a cow and stabbing her in the neck, edited with music, hearts and other graphic overlays. 

PETA spokesperson Moira Colley told Daily Mail: ‘It appears at least three workers are depicted in the videos. At least one is a student of a local school, but all appear to be young.’ 

Georgia’s Best Processing acknowledged the videos on Facebook, saying it was unaware of the actions until the leak. 

‘Upon learning of the situation, we took immediate disciplinary action and fully cooperated with the Georgia Department of Agriculture,’ the statement reads. 

‘The individuals were immediately terminated. The humane treatment of animals entrusted to our care is a responsibility we take very seriously, and we are deeply concerned by what occurred.’

The videos were allegedly recorded by high school students employed at Georgia’s Best Processing in Fort Valley, Georgia, and reportedly shared among workers for amusement, according to PETA

PETA warned that ignoring such acts of cruelty endangers animals and can have serious consequences for communities if violent behaviors escalate. The nonprofit has contacted the students’ school, urging the superintendent to take swift action. 

Studies show childhood animal cruelty is a serious warning sign, often linked to family violence, trauma, and later violence against humans, but it can stem from curiosity, learned behavior, or emotional issues, with persistent or escalating cruelty and lack of empathy.

Daily Mail has contacted Georgia’s Best Processing for comment.

‘It appears at least three workers are depicted in the videos. At least one is a student of a local school, but all appear to be young,’ Colley said.

‘Cows in the meat industry are killed at a fraction of their natural lifespan and don’t receive a bit of kindness during their entire lives, but workers filming themselves stabbing conscious animals in the neck, and even urinating in the face of one, is especially horrific. 

‘These sadistic acts and the callous way in which workers allegedly shared videos of their torment to laugh at are a chilling wake-up call for this community.’

The whistleblower alleged the videos were shared on the social media platform Snapchat. 

She added that while the videos only show short moments of the cow’s struggling, Georgia law requires that animals be rendered unconscious with a single stunning attempt before slaughter.

The whistleblower alleged the videos were shared on the social media platform Snapchat

‘Stabbing the throat of a conscious animal would constitute a violation of the anti-cruelty statute O.C.G.A. § 16-12-4(b)(1), which prohibits causing an animal physical pain, suffering, or death by any unjustifiable act,’ said Colley.

‘The Georgia Department of Agriculture could suspend its inspections of the facility, which would prevent them from slaughtering animals. 

‘The individuals would likely be charged with a misdemeanor, which typically results in a fine of $1,000 or less and/or a sentence of less than 12 months.’

The videos have also surfaced on X, where users have been left outraged. 

‘Animal processing plants have a moral and professional responsibility to treat animals humanely by minimizing pain, stress, and fear at every stage of handling and processing. This is sick,’ one user shared.

In November 2024, PETA released even more shocking videos of workers at a Butterball factory, the largest producer of turkey products in the US, smacking, humping and sexually abusing the birds at the Ozark, Arkansas plant in 2006.

That was years before Butterball was privatized and certified by the American Humane. 

‘We are aware of a video from nearly 20 years ago, which is being reshared across social media,’ a spokesperson for the company told Scripps News.

‘The video is not current and was taken prior to Butterball becoming a private company and prior to engagement certification through American Humane.’

‘Animal care and well-being is central to who we are as a company, and we are committed to the ethical and responsible care of our flocks,’ the spokesperson insisted.

‘Eleven years ago, Butterball was the first, and remains the only, turkey company to be American Humane certified,’ they noted.

‘That means we have yearly audits conducted by a third-party to ensure compliance with our 200-plus science-based standards or best practices for care of turkeys, well exceeding industry best practices.

In November 2024, PETA released even more shocking videos of workers at a Butterball factory, the largest producer of turkey products in the US, smacking, humping and sexually abusing the birds at the Ozark, Arkansas plant in 2006 

‘We are proud of this designation that no other turkey company can claim, and have a zero tolerance policy for animal mistreatment.’

But in the disturbing footage, an undercover investigator claimed he saw a Butterball employee shoving his finger up a turkey’s cloaca, or vagina, for ‘fun’ and witnessed another worker humping a turkey while it was restrained, according to the animal rights group.

He also recalled seeing a ‘worker… taunting another worker by holding a bird by the legs and jerking her back and forth.’

Footage included in the video also showed employees manhandling multiple birds – striking, throwing and hanging them to death.

‘Do you know what happened to your Butterball turkey before it was killed?’ PETA wrote in the caption, without specifying that the content was filmed 18 years ago.

SOURCE PAGE

President Donald Trump’s social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), said on Thursday that it’s merging with TAE Technologies, a Southern California-based company that has been chasing the dream of fusion power for nearly 30 years.

The all-stock transaction, valued at more than $6 billion, would expand Trump Media’s presence into the nascent fusion power space while data centers clamor for more electricity amid the ongoing AI boom.

Fusion industry insiders expressed curiosity over the deal and voiced concerns about potential conflicts of interest with the U.S. Department of Energy. Last week, industry representatives met with Energy Department officials, urging them to help direct billions of dollars toward fusion projects, and earlier this year, the DOE announced a new roadmap to guide commercial efforts in the sector, though it didn’t commit any new funds alongside the announcement.

TMTG is the parent company of Truth Social, the microblogging platform that the president spun up after he was banned from platforms like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook in the wake of the January 6 attacks on the U.S. Capitol. At launch, the president called it “a rival to the liberal media consortium,” and said he wanted to “fight back against the Big Tech companies.”

TMTG went public last year via a merger with a special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), a technique used to go public by private companies that want to raise money quickly but aren’t yet mature enough to take the traditional IPO route. In the quarter ended September 30, 2025, TMTG reported that it recorded a loss of $54.8 million on revenue of $972,900.

Truth Social and the company’s streaming platform have failed to generate much revenue, but TMTG has nevertheless managed to amass $3.1 billion in assets, largely through its cryptocurrency investments and partnerships.

TMTG CEO Devin Nunes, formerly a Republican congressman, stated that the company’s acquisition of TAE would “cement America’s global energy dominance for generations.” The companies said they plan to site and begin construction on “the world’s first utility-scale fusion power plant (50 MWe)” next year, and have plans for more fusion plants that are expected to generate between 350 megawatts to 500 megawatts of electricity.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026

But the path forward for fusion power remains uncertain.

Currently, only one experimental device has proven that controlled fusion reactions can generate more power than they consume. Several other companies, including Bill Gates-backed Commonwealth Fusion Systems and Sam Altman-backed Helion, are in the race to put fusion power on the grid sometime in the early 2030s.

If one or more fusion startups succeed, they could deliver gigawatts of clean, continuous power to the grid using nothing more than hydrogen isotopes filtered from seawater. Inside a fusion reactor, those isotopes are heated and compressed until they turn into a plasma. When particles in the plasma collide, they merge to form a new, heavier atom while releasing tremendous amounts of heat, which can be harvested to generate electricity.

TAE has been working on a range of fusion devices since the late 1990s. The company has raised nearly $2 billion in total, including a recent $150 million round from existing investors including Google, Chevron Technology Ventures, and New Enterprise. The company has been valued at about $1.8 billion, according to PitchBook.

Over the years, TAE has struggled to make its various designs work. Its latest effort uses magnetic fields generated by rotating plasma to stabilize the plasma itself. Particle beams bombard the outside of the plasma cloud, helping it to spin.

In the meantime, TAE has also created a new division focused on the life sciences. It is selling a version of its particle accelerator as a radiation treatment for cancer.

After the merger, Nunes and TAE CEO Dr. Michl Binderbauer will serve as co-CEOs of the combined company.

Update 12:05 p.m. ET: Added comments from fusion industry insiders.

SOURCE PAGE

Instagram’s gotten trickier. What crushed it last year? Totally dead now. The platform keeps switching things up – new features pop up, the algorithm does its thing differently every few months, and people’s scrolling habits change constantly.

Getting likes feels like pulling teeth sometimes. But some stuff still works crazy well. Not those sketchy tricks that fizzle out in a week. Real methods to get more Instagram likes that keep delivering.

Likes Haven’t Gone Anywhere

People keep saying likes are dead. Nope. Not even close. Likes tell Instagram that people actually care about the content. The algorithm uses that signal to decide who else should see it.

More likes mean:

• Posts show up in more feeds and explore pages
• New visitors trust the account more
• Content hits trending spots more easily
• Brands notice and reach out
• Standing out gets way simpler

Sure, likes aren’t the whole game. But anyone saying they’re useless is completely wrong.

How Instagram Actually Works Now

The algorithm got pickier this year. It’s watching way more things:

Who Talks to Who: Posts from people someone chats with regularly? Those get pushed first. Instagram tracks DMs, comments back and forth, profile visits – all of it.

How Fresh It Is: Brand-new posts get a shot at going viral right away. That first hour decides everything basically.

How Long People Stick Around: Content that keeps someone scrolling on Instagram longer wins big. Videos and multiple-image posts beat single photos almost every time.

What Someone Likes Already: Instagram shows people more of what they already engage with. Stay consistent with the niche.

Make Stuff People Can’t Scroll Past

Three seconds. That’s it. Content either hooks someone in three seconds or they’re gone. Scroll, scroll, gone.

What stops the scroll right now:

• Big bold text slapped on the image
• Weird angles nobody expects
• Colors so bright they almost hurt
• Real faces with actual emotions showing
• Questions that make someone stop and think

Carousels Are Cheat Codes

Carousels get more action than regular posts. The reason? People keep swiping through them. Every swipe tells Instagram, Hey, this is good stuff. More swipes equal more reach.

Making carousels that hit:

• Put the best image up front, always
• Make each slide flow into the next one
• The last slide needs a clear next step
• Seven to ten slides work best, usually
• Mix teaching something with keeping it fun

Video Beats Everything Else

Reels get pushed harder than anything right now. Instagram wants video content. Even a quick five-second video clip gets more eyes than a regular photo.

Best length? Seven to fifteen seconds. Hook them in literally one second. Give them something useful or entertaining fast. End with something they’ll remember.

When and How Often to Post

Throwing up posts randomly wastes perfectly good content. Check when followers are actually online. Most accounts see better numbers during:

• Work days: late morning around 11 to 1, then evening 7 to 9
• Weekends: mid-morning between 9 and 11

Try different times for a couple of weeks. See what hits.

Show Up Regularly

Being consistent matters more than anything else. The algorithm learns patterns. Followers learn patterns. Accounts that post regularly get shown to more people than accounts that vanish, then dump a bunch of posts at once.

What actually works:

• Bare minimum: three to four times weekly
• Better: five to seven times weekly
• Reels separately: three to four weekly

Good content matters obviously. But showing up matters even more.

Get People Talking

First hour after posting? Critical. Answering comments fast tells Instagram people are engaged. That pushes the post further.

Try hitting every comment within 30 to 60 minutes. Real responses, though – not just heart emojis or “thanks so much!”

Hashtags That Make Sense

Hashtags work still, just differently now. Those massive ones like #instagood? Pointless. Focus on:

• Medium ones – 10,000 to 500,000 posts range
• Tags specific to the niche
• Eight to fifteen per post tops
• Stick them in the first comment or way at the bottom

Tag Others Smart

Tagging brings in more eyes if done right. Tag brands when showing their stuff, locations for travel posts, and other creators for collabs. Random spam tagging? Instagram punishes that hard.

Use Instagram’s Own Tools

Weird but true – posting stories regularly makes feed posts do better. Instagram likes accounts using everything they built. Three to five stories daily with:

• What’s happening behind the scenes
• Polls and question boxes
• Countdowns for what’s coming
• Reposting what followers make
• Sneak peeks of feed content

Go Live Sometimes

Live videos get a major push. Instagram actually notifies people when going live. Even ten minutes makes the whole account more visible for days after.

Live ideas that work:

• Quick question and answer sessions
• Showing how something’s made
• Testing products or trying things
• Just talking about the niche casually

Growing Faster Without Looking Fake

Find accounts doing similar stuff but not competing directly. Do shoutouts together, go live together, make content together. Gets shown to people already interested in that type of stuff.

Look for:

• Similar follower numbers
• About the same engagement
• Audiences that overlap without being identical

Get a Smart Boost When Needed

Sometimes growth just needs a push to get going. Services like BuzzVoice help get more Instagram likes from actual, real people. That initial bump gets the algorithm moving. Content reaches more people naturally after that.

The trick? Use it to help already good content, not fix bad content. It’s like lighter fluid on a fire that’s already lit.

Make Every Part Count

Captions do more than most people realize. Good captions keep someone reading instead of scrolling. That extra time on the post signals quality to Instagram.

Captions that work:

• First line grabs attention hard
• The next couple of sentences give value
• Clear instructions on what to do next
• Tags at the end

Tell People What to Do

Say it straight. Double-tap if you agree, or Save this for later gives clear direction. Posts telling people exactly what to do get way more engagement than posts that just sit there.

Getting more likes:

• Hit like if this helped you
• Double-tap for the second part
• Show love if you relate
• I like to save this for later

Check the Numbers and Do More of What Works

Look at the stats every week:

• Which posts got the most likes
• What times worked best
• Which format crushed it
• What captions did people respond to
• Which tags brought people in

Do way more of whatever’s working. Cut whatever’s flopping. Pretty straightforward.

Conclusion

Want to get more Instagram likes in 2026? No shortcuts exist. These methods work fine, but they take actual effort and showing up consistently. Accounts winning right now mix everything: solid content, smart timing, talking to people for real, and yeah, sometimes a strategic boost from something reliable like BuzzVoice.

Instagram gives more reach to accounts that follow the rules while giving people something actually worth seeing. Make content people genuinely want to look at. Talk to the community like a real person. Use growth tools when it makes sense. Likes come after that.

Overthinking kills momentum. Just start doing this stuff today. Watch what happens. Adjust based on results. Growth builds on itself over time.

The accounts blowing up aren’t doing anything magical. They’re just consistent with content that doesn’t suck, they engage like humans, and they track what actually moves the needle. Do that enough, and the numbers climb.

SOURCE PAGE

Actors have voted to refuse digital scanning to prevent their likeness being used by artificial intelligence in a pushback against AI in the arts.

Members of the performing arts union Equity were asked if they would refuse to be scanned while on set, a common practice in which actors’ likeness is captured for future use – with 99% voting in favour of the move.

The general secretary, Paul Fleming, said: “Artificial intelligence is a generation-defining challenge. And for the first time in a generation, Equity’s film and TV members have shown that they are willing to take industrial action.

“Ninety per cent of TV and film is made on these agreements. Over three-quarters of artists working on them are union members. This shows that the workforce is willing to significantly disrupt production unless they are respected, and [if] decades of erosion in terms and conditions begins to be reversed.”

The vote was an indicative ballot designed to demonstrate the strength of feeling on the issue, with more than 7,000 members polled on a 75% turnout. However, actors would not be legally protected if they refused to be scanned.

The union said it would write to Pact, the trade body representing the majority of producers and production companies in the UK, to negotiate new minimum standards for pay, as well as terms and conditions for actors working in film and TV.

Equity said it may hold a formal ballot depending on the outcome of the negotiations, which, if backed, would give actors legal protection if they were being pressed to accept digital scanning on set.

The decision comes after months of debate and growing concern about performers’ rights as AI becomes embedded in the creative industries, with high-profile actors urging Equity members to support the push to stop digital scanning.

Adrian Lester, Hugh Bonneville and Harriet Walter have backed the union’s campaign to ensure AI protections for performers are written into union agreements.

Bonneville said actors’ likenesses and voices should not be “exploited for the benefit of others without licence or consent”, while Lester said actors at the start of their careers often found it difficult to push back against body scanning.

In October, Olivia Williams told the Guardian that performers were routinely pressed to have their bodies scanned on set without having a say over how the data was later used.

The Dune star argued that actors should have as much control over data harvested from body scans as they do over nudity scenes. She said some contracts included clauses that appeared to give studios carte blanche over a performer’s likeness “on all platforms now existing or yet to be devised throughout the universe in perpetuity”.

The arrival of the first AI “actor”, Tilly Norwood, further heightened concerns and demands for formal agreements on what is and is not permissible.

In 2023, concerns over AI were at the heart of the Hollywood writers’ strike, with writers and actors warning that unchecked use of the technology could radically reshape the industry and undermine their roles.

SOURCE PAGE

Building anything of value is hard anywhere in the world. In Africa, it is harder.  The Builders’ List recognises people doing it anyway.

Beyond shipping products, Africa’s technology ecosystem constantly navigates unreliable power, fragmented logistics, weak public infrastructure, and regulatory uncertainty—often all at once. Progress is rarely linear, and success is usually hard-won. 

Founders alone do not make the industry. It is sustained by people doing a variety of work, some of it invisible but critical to the industry’s success. To recognise them, TechCabal is launching The Builders’ List: an annual index of the most consequential people shaping Africa’s technology ecosystem in the calendar year. It is a record of who’s building, and what their work reveals about the system they are building within. 

For the inaugural edition, our selected Builders  are grouped across five categories:

• Operators: Those who make systems work at scale.
• Innovators: Those creating new products, models, or technical possibilities.
• Enablers:  The individuals and institutions lowering the cost of building for others.
• Organisers:  Those connecting people, capital, and opportunity.
• Keepers: The stewards of trust, continuity, and institutional memory.

Together, these roles offer a more complete map of how the ecosystem functions.

The Builders’ List is an editorial project led by the TechCabal newsroom, informed by independent reporting and conversations with founders, operators, investors, policymakers, and long-time ecosystem observers across the continent and the diaspora. 

Our selections were based on our assessment of what materially changed within the calendar year, from infrastructure to policy or scale, rather than reputation or momentum alone. Where work is still emerging, progress was evaluated within the realities of the sector, market, and country in which it occurred.

Candidates were assessed comparatively and contextually. Starting from over 600 deeply researched names spanning all 54 African countries, we weighed outcomes against each builder’s operating environment—geography, regulation, capital access, impact and institutional maturity. Context that applies in Lagos doesn’t automatically translate to Kigali or Dakar.

Final decisions were made through editorial review. While external perspectives informed our reporting, the list reflects TechCabal’s independent editorial judgment.

This process, as our first, has been a critical learning curve. It reminded us that Africa’s technology ecosystem is far broader than funding headlines suggest—spanning hardware engineers in Cairo, beekeepers in rural Kenya, ministers rewiring infrastructure, and documentarians building institutional memory.

We learned that in 2025, the builders who matter most are no longer defined by capital raised or growth velocity, but by what they’ve made durable. This list revealed an ecosystem maturing past obsessions with scale and spectacle, toward the quieter work of building things that last—profitable businesses, regulatory frameworks, talent pipelines, and infrastructure others can build on.

The Builders’ List will return in 2026, and the patterns will shift. But the commitment remains: to document not just who is building, but what their work reveals about the system taking shape.

SOURCE PAGE

Apple announced it will allow alternative app stores in Japan and will permit developers to process payments for digital goods and services outside of its own in-app purchase system in iOS. The iPhone maker is not making these changes because it wants to be more open; it’s being forced — in this case, to comply with the country’s Mobile Software Competition Act (MSCA), which is now going into effect.

With this update, Apple’s App Store revenues are being impacted in another major market due to anticompetition laws and regulations. The company already has to comply with Europe’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), which previously required the tech giant to allow for alternative app stores and other changes.

In the U.S., Apple has been strong-armed into changing its in-payments system by way of the courts, after a lawsuit from Fortnite maker, Epic Games. Though it was not declared a monopoly, the court decided Apple needed to give developers the right to process payments outside of its system if they chose. (The specifics around that order are still being worked out after an appeal partially reversed an earlier ruling.)

As usual, in its announcement about the changes in Japan, Apple warned that alternative app marketplaces and payments open up “new avenues for malware, fraud, scams, and privacy and security risks.” To mitigate those risks, the company said it worked with Japanese regulators to require an authorization process for app marketplaces (“Notarization”), which it says is designed to protect children specifically from inappropriate content and scams.

The fact that Apple has come up with a process to dial back the risk for alternative app stores indicates there has always been a technical solution at hand to balance the needs for both openness and security.

As in the EU, Apple has come up with a complex fee structure to ensure it doesn’t lose much in the form of App Store revenue, while seemingly complying with the letter of the law.

APPLE

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney, of course, was not silent on this matter, saying Fortnite will still not return to iOS in Japan because Apple is charging a 21% fee on third-party in-app purchases.

In a post on X, he wrote, “Apple was required to open up iOS to competing stores today, and instead of doing so honestly, they have launched another travesty of obstruction and lawbreaking in gross disrespect to the government and people of Japan. Apple chose poorly. Again.”

Sadly, Fortnite will not return to iOS in Japan in 2025 as promised. Apple was required to open up iOS to competing stores today, and instead of doing so honestly, they have launched another travesty of obstruction and lawbreaking in gross disrespect to the government and people… pic.twitter.com/7hu5eGMQX6

— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) December 18, 2025

He also pointed out the difference between Apple and other game store providers, like Microsoft, by asking, “Can you imagine the gamer and regulator uproar that would ensue if Microsoft required all games from Steam and Epic Games Store to call its commerce surveillance API and report all transactions back to Microsoft?”

“That’s what Apple just announced in Japan,” he added.

Apple noted that developers will need to agree to the latest update to the Apple Developer Program License Agreement, which includes the new options for Japan, by March 17, 2026.

SOURCE PAGE

For a lot of creators, dropping a link on Facebook is almost muscle memory. You post, add the link to your product, affiliate offer, or newsletter, and hope it pulls people off the platform and into your world. That small action might soon come with a price tag.

Meta is testing a change that could limit how many links some users can share on Facebook. According to a screenshot shared by social media strategist Matt Navarra, creators who were part of this test received a notification recently from Meta stating: “Starting December 16, certain Facebook profiles without Meta Verified, including yours, will be limited to sharing links in 2 links in two organic posts per month.”

Image credit: Matt Navarra

Anything more than two links would require a Meta Verified subscription, which starts at $14.99 per month.

On paper, this looks like a simple experiment. In reality, it cuts right to the heart of how many creators use Facebook as a traffic engine. Affiliate marketers, small business owners, coaches, and writers often rely on frequent links to drive sales or leads elsewhere. Limiting those links forces a rethink of how, or even whether, Facebook still works for them.

A Meta spokesperson has framed the test to Engadget as a way to understand “whether the ability to publish an increased volume of posts with links adds additional value for Meta Verified subscribers.”

That explanation fits a broader pattern. Platforms are under pressure to monetise creators more directly, and one of the easiest levers to pull is access. Once free features become gated, especially when they encourage users to leave the app.

This test comes at a very interesting time, as Meta recently released its Transparency report for Q3 2025, which states, “98.1% of the views in the US during Q3 2025 did not include a link to a source outside of Facebook. For the 1.9% of views in posts that did include a link, they typically came from a Page the person followed.” That data suggests links are not central to most people’s Facebook experience, which makes it easier for Meta to treat them as a premium feature rather than a default one.

For creators, the impact could be dire. Fewer links mean fewer chances to test offers, fewer campaign touchpoints, and more pressure to compress everything into one or two posts. It also creates a clear fork in the road: pay for Meta Verified, drastically limit how you use Facebook, or start investing more heavily in platforms where linking is still unrestricted, or better still, build your own community.

This isn’t a Meta-only instinct. In 2023, X removed headlines from news links, arguing that it improved aesthetics while quietly reducing the emphasis on outbound clicks. Across the industry, the signal is consistent. Platforms want users to stay put, scrolling longer, and interacting inside the app, not leaving it.

Whether Meta rolls this test out widely is still uncertain. But even as an experiment, it signals how creators are increasingly viewed: not just as users, but as revenue opportunities. If link limits become normalised, Facebook may shift from being a traffic hub to a gated space where reach and flexibility depend on how much you’re willing to pay.

For creators who built their businesses on free distribution, that would be a fundamental change, and one that forces hard decisions about where their time, content, and money are best spent.

Facebook News is being scrapped as Meta scales back news and political content

According to Meta, the number of people using Facebook News in Australia and the U.S. dropped by over 80% in 2023.

Updated

December 18, 2025

Link copied!
Copy failed!

SOURCE PAGE